read testimony

May 19, 2003

Senate Committee on
Commerce, Science and Transportation
Washington, DC 20510-6125

Dear Chairman McCain, Senator Hollings, and Members of the Committee:

We thank the Committee for holding what we hope will be the first of several Congressional hearings to address cable competition, pricing, customer service and related issues. Local governments welcome the opportunity to share with the Committee our experience as cable regulators, public right-of-way managers, and community interest advocates. At the close of the May 6, 2003 hearing on Competition in the Market for Video Services, Senator Burns indicated that the record would be left open and that parties were welcome to offer comments. On behalf of the undersigned representative associations of local governments, we therefore submit this testimony for the record to provide the Committee with a ground-level assessment of how current rate regulation and competition policies are working, and to clarify the nature and importance of local governments’ role in promoting competition and protecting cable and broadband consumers.

Local governments were disappointed that the Committee’s hearing did not include a witness representing local governments, particularly since local governments are the government entities responsible for reviewing cable operator rate filings and approving or modifying cable operator selected rates as part of the federal rate regulation regime. Moreover, as the regulatory agency closest and most accessible to consumers, local governments receive daily input from subscribers regarding rates, billing and the general performance of cable operators and broadband service providers, and we work daily with these industries to resolve a wide range of consumer issues. Nevertheless, local governments renew our pledge to assist the Committee in any way we can to address the Committee’s concerns as well as the cable issues outlined in our testimony.

We draw the Committee’s attention to what we think is the primary explanation for the continued escalation in cable rates, namely, the lack of wireline competition for cable providers. Local governments have used their authority to promote competition and deployment, strengthen consumer protections, and facilitate viewpoint diversity and localism in video programming. In contrast, cable operators are using their market power to drive out video programming competitors, are refusing to run advertisements from DSL competitors on their cable systems, have attempted to infringe on the privacy rights of consumers, and are using exclusive contracts to deny competitors access to local origination programming. Contrary to the testimony of the May 6th cable industry witnesses, there is no evidence that cable operators will limit rate increases if they obtain more control over cable programming through á la carte pricing or other forms of deregulation. We remind the Committee that cable operators used á la carte tiers in 1994 as a means of evading rate regulation. Without meaningful competition or effective rate regulation, the cable industry will not voluntarily lower rates.

Local governments also urge the Committee to consider additional oversight of the FCC. As implemented today, FCC rate regulation rules do not ensure reasonable rates, despite the continued congressional mandate to do so. Furthermore, we believe that misguided FCC interpretations and inaction have thwarted local government efforts to make effective use of the rate regulation process, such as it is. Finally, local governments are deeply concerned that if the FCC does not act to curb current market power abuses by incumbent cable operators, wireline competition for video programming and broadband service will be irreparably harmed. We urge the Committee to work with local governments to protect subscribers from unreasonable rates and to promote continued growth of wireline competition in a manner that respects the sovereignty, property rights and important regulatory role of local governments. Sincerely,

Don Borut
Executive Director
National League of Cities

J. Thomas Cochran
Executive Director
The U.S. Conference of Mayors

Larry Naake
Executive Director
National Association of Counties

Libby Beaty
Executive Director
National Association of Telecommunications Officers and Advisors

Hon. Marilyn J. Praisner
Chair
TeleCommUnity

read testimony